- Peringkat
- #127
- Total token output
- 255,329
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 63.19s
- Total Biaya
- $2.263
Grok 4.7 (low) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
GLM 5.1 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.5 vs 7.4. GLM 5.1 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.066 vs $2.263. Grok 4.7 (low) lebih cepat di 63.19s vs 66.38s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 73.9% vs 66.7%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #119
- Total token output
- 248,708
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 66.38s
- Total Biaya
- $1.066
Model yang direkomendasikan
GLM 5.1 (medium)
It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 2.1x less than Grok 4.7 (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.7 Grok 4.7 low | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.4 | 7.5 |
| Peringkat | #127 | #119 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 9.2 |
| Konsistensi | 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 73.9% | 66.7% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 5 | 4 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 13.804 | 9.004 |
| Total Biaya | $2.263 | $1.066 |
| Harga input | $2.000 / 1M | $0.965 / 1M |
| Harga output | $6.000 / 1M | $3.032 / 1M |
| Total token input | 365,119 | 331,577 |
| Token output | 8,118 | 17,919 |
| Token penalaran | 247,211 | 230,789 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 63.19s | 66.38s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 389.63s | 308.75s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1453.28s | 1460.31s |
| Parameter | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) | 744B total (40B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Sumber terbuka |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#127 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7
low- Biaya
- $0.007
- Waktu
- 15.2s
- Token
- 1,537 tok
#119 GLM 5.1
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 300.0s
- Token
- 0 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Space Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumGrok 4.7lowvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighSeed-2.0-CodemediumvsGrok 4.7lowInkling SmallhighTersedia gratisvsGrok 4.7lowQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.7lowGPT-5.6 LunamediumvsGrok 4.7lowQwen3.8 27BlowTersedia gratisvsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-6 LunalowvsGLM 5.1mediumDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423nonevsGrok 4.7lowInklingmediumTersedia gratisvsGrok 4.7lowGemma 4 26B A4BmediumTersedia gratisvsGrok 4.7lowSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1medium