- Peringkat
- #159
- Total token output
- 121,415
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 18.14s
- Total Biaya
- $1.345
Grok 4.5 (low) vs Grok 4.6 (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.8 vs 7.8. Grok 4.5 (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.345 vs $2.270. Grok 4.5 (low) lebih cepat di 18.14s vs 74.77s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 73.9% vs 78.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #157
- Total token output
- 266,197
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 74.77s
- Total Biaya
- $2.270
Model yang direkomendasikan
Grok 4.5 (low)
It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 1.7x less than Grok 4.6 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 low | Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.8 | 7.8 |
| Peringkat | #159 | #157 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.3 | 8.7 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 73.9% | 78.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 4 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 8.404 | 14.187 |
| Total Biaya | $1.345 | $2.270 |
| Harga input | $2.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $6.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.300 / 1M | $0.500 / 1M |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | T/A |
| Total token input | 308,068 | 336,351 |
| Token output | 9,218 | 6,180 |
| Token penalaran | 112,197 | 260,017 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 18.14s | 74.77s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 205.28s | 514.35s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 417.21s | 1719.73s |
| Parameter | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#159 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5
low- Biaya
- $0.011
- Waktu
- 12.4s
- Token
- 2,018 tok
#157 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6
medium- Biaya
- $0.028
- Waktu
- 72.1s
- Token
- 4,771 tok
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumvsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5lowGrok 4.6mediumvsGLM 5.3highQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.6mediumStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5lowDeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017highvsGrok 4.6mediumLing 3.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.6mediumMuse WondermaxvsGrok 4.6mediumGrok 4.5lowvsGLM 5.3highMuse WonderhighvsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighvsGrok 4.6mediumGPT-6 LunahighvsGrok 4.5low