#26 xAI: Grok 4.5
low- Biaya
- $0.011
- Waktu
- 12.4s
- Token
- 2,018 tok
xAI: Grok 4.5 vs xAI: Grok 4.5
Grok 4.5 (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.4 vs 8.3. Grok 4.5 (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.935 vs $1.928. Grok 4.5 (low) lebih cepat di 15.56s vs 61.71s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 75.8% vs 78.8%.
Model yang direkomendasikanGrok 4.5 (low)It has the best score here (8.4), while costing about 2.1x less than Grok 4.5 (medium).
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25
| Metrik | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 low | Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Peringkat | #26 | #28 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 75.8% | 78.8% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 3 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 5.844 | 12.049 |
| Total Biaya | $0.935 | $1.928 |
| Harga input | $2.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $6.000 / 1M | $6.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 125,596 | 122,146 |
| Token output | 7,505 | 5,514 |
| Token penalaran | 106,446 | 275,053 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 15.56s | 61.71s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 205.28s | 436.38s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 342.32s | 1357.56s |
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#28 xAI: Grok 4.5
medium- Biaya
- $0.044
- Waktu
- 59.4s
- Token
- 7,512 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.2mediumvsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.6 Max PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.5lowMuse Spark 1.1lowvsGrok 4.5mediumClaude Sonnet 5mediumvsGrok 4.5lowGPT-5.4mediumvsGrok 4.5lowGemini 2.5 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5lowClaude Fable 5mediumvsGrok 4.5lowMuse Spark 1.1mediumvsGrok 4.5lowMuse Spark 1.1highvsGrok 4.5mediumClaude Opus 5lowvsGrok 4.5mediumGemini 3.5 Flash-LitehighvsGrok 4.5mediumInklinghighvsGrok 4.5medium