- Peringkat
- #74
- Total token output
- 236,627
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 62.57s
- Total Biaya
- $1.046
Inkling (high) vs Grok 4.7 (low)
Inkling (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.0 vs 7.9. Inkling (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.046 vs $1.320. Grok 4.7 (low) lebih cepat di 59.02s vs 62.57s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 77.3% vs 77.3%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #81
- Total token output
- 231,848
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 59.02s
- Total Biaya
- $1.320
Model yang direkomendasikan
Inkling (high)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Inkling Inkling high | Grok 4.7 Grok 4.7 low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.0 | 7.9 |
| Peringkat | #74 | #81 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 77.3% | 77.3% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 5 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 6.968 | 9.422 |
| Total Biaya | $1.046 | $1.320 |
| Harga input | $1.000 / 1M | $1.600 / 1M |
| Harga output | $4.050 / 1M | $4.800 / 1M |
| Total token input | 86,755 | 128,832 |
| Token output | 6,057 | 6,840 |
| Token penalaran | 230,570 | 225,008 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 62.57s | 59.02s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 327.51s | 389.63s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1376.46s | 1298.42s |
| Parameter | 975B total (41B aktif) | ~1.7T total (~170B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Sumber terbuka | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#74 Thinking Machines: Inkling
high- Biaya
- $0.005
- Waktu
- 32.2s
- Token
- 1,275 tok
#81 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7
low- Biaya
- $0.007
- Waktu
- 15.2s
- Token
- 1,537 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
InklinghighvsGrok 4.7mediumKimi K3maxvsGrok 4.7lowGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGrok 4.7lowStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.7lowDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsInklinghighGPT-5.6 TerrahighvsGrok 4.7lowInklingmediumvsGrok 4.7lowMuse Glimmer 30BxhighvsInklinghighGPT-5 MinimediumvsInklinghighQwen3.8 2.4T A95BlowvsInklinghighQwen3.7 PlusmediumvsGrok 4.7lowGrok 4.7lowvsGLM 5.2high