Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.6 Plus vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.8 vs 7.9. Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.267 vs $0.405. Qwen3.6 Plus (medium) lebih cepat di 43.12s vs 51.51s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 71.2% vs 75.8%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.7 Plus (medium)It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 1.5x less than Qwen3.6 Plus (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Qwen3.6 Plus Qwen3.6 Plus medium Rilis: 2026-04-20 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Rilis: 2026-06-03
Skor 7.8 7.9
Peringkat #37 #36
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 9.3 8.9
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 71.2% 75.8%
Tes tidak stabil 2 3
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 1.514 2.072
Total Biaya $0.405 $0.267
Harga input $0.325 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Harga output $1.950 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total token input 97,689 115,233
Token output 6,412 6,162
Token penalaran 184,825 173,267
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 43.12s 51.51s
Waktu respons (maks) 291.55s 315.30s
Waktu respons (total) 905.53s 1133.15s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#37 Qwen3.6 Plus

medium
Biaya
$0.024
Waktu
219.0s
Token
12,235 tok

#36 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Biaya
$0.018
Waktu
193.2s
Token
10,821 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.6 Plus 6.1 7.8 44.4% 1 153.12s 7,098 58 50,586
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan