#108 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B
medium- Biaya
- $0.009
- Waktu
- 71.4s
- Token
- 8,631 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Step 3.5 Flash (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.6 vs 6.3. Step 3.5 Flash (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.070 vs $0.401. Step 3.5 Flash (medium) lebih cepat di 72.53s vs 72.57s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 69.8% vs 54.0%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Step 3.5 Flash Step 3.5 Flash medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 6.3 | 6.6 |
| Peringkat | #108 | #98 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 69.8% | 54.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 6 | 1 |
| Total Run | 63 | 60 |
| Biaya per hasil | 5.162 | 0.198 |
| Total Biaya | $0.401 | $0.070 |
| Harga input | $0.140 / 1M | $0.100 / 1M |
| Harga output | $1.000 / 1M | $0.300 / 1M |
| Total token input | 42,196 | 34,431 |
| Token output | 40,630 | 91,587 |
| Token penalaran | 353,577 | 195,973 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 72.57s | 72.53s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 409.98s | 453.94s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 1524.04s | 1015.47s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.5-35B-A3B | 5.9 | 9.3 | 33.3% | 0 | 206.65s | 4,106 | 23,844 | 111,462 | |
| Step 3.5 Flash | 2.4 | 5.2 | 0.0% | 0 | 258.38s | 2,211 | 13,207 | 22,429 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan