Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.4 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.197 vs $1.627. Qwen3.7 Max lebih cepat di 4.52s vs 111.94s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 72.7% vs 68.2%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.7 MaxIt has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 8.3x less than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Rilis: 2026-02-24 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Rilis: 2026-05-22
Skor 7.4 7.4
Peringkat #58 #59
Keandalan 10.0 9.9
Konsistensi 8.2 10.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 72.7% 68.2%
Tes tidak stabil 5 0
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 8.324 1.582
Total Biaya $1.627 $0.197
Harga input $0.260 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Harga output $2.600 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total token input 111,635 95,983
Token output 15,999 12,446
Token penalaran 598,430 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 111.94s 4.52s
Waktu respons (maks) 1026.43s 72.30s
Waktu respons (total) 2462.67s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#58 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Biaya
$0.008
Waktu
62.0s
Token
3,099 tok

#59 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Biaya
$0.046
Waktu
195.0s
Token
12,171 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan