Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Max

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 7.5 vs 7.4. Qwen3.7 Max memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.197 vs $0.519. Qwen3.7 Max lebih cepat di 4.52s vs 5.31s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 74.2% vs 68.2%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.7 MaxIt has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 2.6x less than GPT-5.6 Terra (low).

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-17

Metrik GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra low Rilis: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Rilis: 2026-05-22
Skor 7.5 7.4
Peringkat #53 #57
Keandalan 10.0 9.9
Konsistensi 7.9 10.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 74.2% 68.2%
Tes tidak stabil 6 0
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 3.989 1.582
Total Biaya $0.519 $0.197
Harga input $2.500 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Harga output $15.000 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total token input 80,295 95,983
Token output 4,714 12,446
Token penalaran 16,469 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 5.31s 4.52s
Waktu respons (maks) 19.85s 72.30s
Waktu respons (total) 116.82s 99.52s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#53 GPT-5.6 Terra

low
Biaya
$0.034
Waktu
16.8s
Token
2,348 tok

#57 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Biaya
$0.046
Waktu
195.0s
Token
12,171 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 9.56s 7,302 429 6,821
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan