Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Ringkasan

GPT-5.6 Luna (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 6.2 vs 5.3. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.020 vs $0.141. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B lebih cepat di 3.41s vs 4.35s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 57.1% vs 31.8%.

Model yang direkomendasikanQwen3.5-122B-A10BIt offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (5.3), lower cost than GPT-5.6 Luna (low), and balanced response time.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-16

Metrik GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna low Rilis: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Rilis: 2026-02-24
Skor 6.2 5.3
Peringkat #114 #153
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.5 9.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 57.1% 31.8%
Tes tidak stabil 4 1
Total Run 63 63
Biaya per hasil 1.404 0.393
Total Biaya $0.141 $0.020
Harga input $1.000 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Harga output $6.000 / 1M $2.080 / 1M
Total token input 34,218 47,735
Token output 2,110 3,383
Token penalaran 15,571 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 4.35s 3.41s
Waktu respons (maks) 18.06s 46.00s
Waktu respons (total) 91.45s 71.59s

Showcase generasi

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#114 GPT-5.6 Luna

low
Biaya
$0.011
Waktu
10.2s
Token
1,897 tok

#153 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Biaya
$0.016
Waktu
44.5s
Token
6,431 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.61s 7,302 557 3,535
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan