- Peringkat
- #73
- Total token output
- 80,538
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 31.29s
- Total Biaya
- $1.558
GPT-5.2 (medium) vs GPT-6 Sol (low)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 8.7 vs 8.7. GPT-6 Sol (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.477 vs $1.558. GPT-6 Sol (low) lebih cepat di 8.72s vs 31.29s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 73.9% vs 87.0%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #77
- Total token output
- 13,211
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 8.72s
- Total Biaya
- $0.477
Model yang direkomendasikan
GPT-6 Sol (low)
It has the best score here (8.7), while costing about 3.3x less than GPT-5.2 (medium).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium | GPT-6 Sol GPT-6 Sol low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.7 | 8.7 |
| Peringkat | #73 | #77 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 73.9% | 87.0% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 4 | 4 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 10.261 | 2.650 |
| Total Biaya | $1.558 | $0.477 |
| Harga input | $1.750 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $14.000 / 1M | $10.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.175 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga tulis cache | T/A | $2.500 / 1M |
| Total token input | 235,207 | 172,359 |
| Token output | 11,065 | 5,026 |
| Token penalaran | 69,473 | 8,185 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 31.29s | 8.72s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 116.86s | 48.43s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 531.98s | 200.61s |
| Parameter | ~1.2T total (~80B aktif) | ~2T total (~150B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#73 GPT-5.2
medium- Biaya
- $0.047
- Waktu
- 49.2s
- Token
- 3,396 tok
#77 GPT-6 Sol
low- Biaya
- $0.018
- Waktu
- 17.4s
- Token
- 1,850 tok
Rincian Kategori
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
GPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsGPT-6 SollowGPT-6 SollowvsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumGPT-6 SollowvsQwen3.8 27BhighTersedia gratisDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsGPT-6 SollowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsGPT-5.2mediumMuse Spark 1.2lowvsGPT-5.2mediumKimi K3.1 PromaxvsGPT-5.2mediumClaude Sonnet 5.5highvsGPT-6 SollowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsGPT-5.2mediumKimi K3.1 PromaxvsGPT-6 SollowMuse Spark 1.1lowvsGPT-5.2medium