Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Muse Glimmer 30B (high) vs Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.5 vs 7.3. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.437 vs $0.529. Muse Glimmer 30B (high) lebih cepat di 65.50s vs 89.19s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 68.2% vs 71.2%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-08-14

Peringkat
#96
Total token output
372,149
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
65.50s
Total Biaya
$0.529
Peringkat
#87
Total token output
260,704
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
89.19s
Total Biaya
$0.437
Model yang direkomendasikan Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 (medium)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B high Rilis: 2026-08-11 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Rilis: 2026-02-15
Skor 7.3 7.5
Peringkat #96 #87
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 7.6 8.5
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 68.2% 71.2%
Tes tidak stabil 7 4
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 4.805 3.348
Total Biaya $0.529 $0.437
Harga input $0.350 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Harga output $1.500 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total token input 103,482 113,560
Token output 105,680 9,823
Token penalaran 266,469 250,881
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 65.50s 89.19s
Waktu respons (maks) 451.90s 304.85s
Waktu respons (total) 1440.91s 1337.92s
Parameter 30B ~397B total (~17B aktif)
Ketersediaan Sumber terbuka Tertutup

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 Muse Glimmer 30B

high
Biaya
$0.005
Waktu
61.7s
Token
3,097 tok

#87 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15

medium
Biaya
$0.011
Waktu
125.5s
Token
7,040 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 95.97s 7,419 16,128 55,433
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 6.6 7.1 44.4% 1 180.70s 6,950 420 80,595

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan