- Peringkat
- #67
- Total token output
- 40,577
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 5.30s
- Total Biaya
- $0.047
Muse Ember (minimal) vs Kimi K3.1 Pro (low)
Muse Ember (minimal) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.9 vs 8.8. Muse Ember (minimal) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.047 vs $1.836. Muse Ember (minimal) lebih cepat di 5.30s vs 47.50s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 76.8% vs 81.2%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #70
- Total token output
- 139,158
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 47.50s
- Total Biaya
- $1.836
Model yang direkomendasikan
Muse Ember (minimal)
It has the best score here (8.9), while costing about 39.2x less than Kimi K3.1 Pro (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Muse Ember Muse Ember minimal | Kimi K3.1 Pro Kimi K3.1 Pro low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Peringkat | #67 | #70 |
| Keandalan | 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 8.9 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 76.8% | 81.2% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 3 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.276 | 10.796 |
| Total Biaya | $0.047 | $1.836 |
| Harga input | $0.100 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.500 / 1M | $10.000 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.004 / 1M | $0.200 / 1M |
| Harga tulis cache | $0.125 / 1M | T/A |
| Total token input | 265,844 | 221,802 |
| Token output | 10,584 | 12,498 |
| Token penalaran | 29,993 | 126,660 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 5.30s | 47.50s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 48.15s | 506.95s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 121.82s | 1092.61s |
| Parameter | ~150B total (~10B aktif) | ~2.8T total (~104B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#67 Muse Ember
minimal- Biaya
- $0.002
- Waktu
- 4.5s
- Token
- 2,690 tok
#70 MoonshotAI: Kimi K3.1 Pro
low
fetch failed
- Biaya
- $0.000
- Waktu
- 10.7s
- Token
- 0 tok
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 48.15s | 147,537 | 2,489 | 1,109 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 69.28s | 103,362 | 1,789 | 2,468 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.03s | 798 | 330 | 1,076 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.90s | 1,650 | 286 | 1,982 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.66s | 7,410 | 577 | 6,099 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 18.91s | 8,070 | 468 | 7,531 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 7.3 | 5.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 9.58s | 89,458 | 5,369 | 4,624 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 52.27s | 88,134 | 8,439 | 5,435 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.57s | 7,215 | 234 | 570 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.31s | 7,845 | 273 | 394 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.96s | 873 | 344 | 7,621 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 4.1 | 4.4 | 44.5% | 2 | 243.49s | 1,515 | 150 | 99,091 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.65s | 522 | 109 | 567 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.96s | 735 | 166 | 608 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.10s | 759 | 111 | 824 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.84s | 1,185 | 147 | 961 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 3.33s | 786 | 412 | 5,631 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 7.6 | 7.2 | 77.8% | 1 | 7.29s | 1,425 | 376 | 1,588 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.67s | 10,258 | 539 | 175 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.24s | 7,413 | 348 | 227 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muse Ember | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.88s | 228 | 70 | 1,697 | |
| Kimi K3.1 Pro | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 44.64s | 468 | 56 | 6,375 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Fable 5mediumvsMuse EmberminimalMuse EmberminimalvsPareto 26.9defaultKimi K3.1 ProlowvsGPT-5.4mediumKimi K3.1 ProlowvsPareto 26.9defaultClaude Fable 5mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse EmberminimalvsQwen3.8 MAXlowMuse Spark 1.1mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse Spark 1.2mediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse EmberxhighvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse Spark OpenmediumvsKimi K3.1 ProlowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsKimi K3.1 ProlowMuse EmberminimalvsGLM 5.3 Flashmax