Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Thinking Machines: Inkling

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.5 vs 5.2. Inkling memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.147 vs $1.976. Inkling lebih cepat di 3.50s vs 15.07s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 93.9% vs 28.8%.

Model yang direkomendasikanGemini 3.5 Flash (high)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-18

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Rilis: 2026-05-19 Inkling Inkling none Rilis: 2026-07-18
Skor 9.5 5.2
Peringkat #2 #160
Keandalan 10.0 9.9
Konsistensi 9.3 9.6
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 93.9% 28.8%
Tes tidak stabil 2 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 9.879 2.448
Total Biaya $1.976 $0.147
Harga input $1.500 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Harga output $9.000 / 1M $4.050 / 1M
Total token input 107,137 104,111
Token output 8,777 10,551
Token penalaran 192,900 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 15.07s 3.50s
Waktu respons (maks) 145.92s 48.02s
Waktu respons (total) 331.48s 77.09s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#2 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Biaya
$0.208
Waktu
118.2s
Token
23,158 tok

#160 Thinking Machines: Inkling

none
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
5.3s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Inkling 4.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.01s 7,356 436 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan