Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) vs Hunter Alpha (medium)

Gemini 3.5 Flash (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.5 vs 4.7. Hunter Alpha (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.000 vs $1.976. Hunter Alpha (medium) lebih cepat di 10.33s vs 15.07s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 93.9% vs 53.0%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-25

Peringkat
#4
Total token output
201,677
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
15.07s
Total Biaya
$1.976
Peringkat
#199
Total token output
22,651
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
10.33s
Total Biaya
$0.000
Model yang direkomendasikan Gemini 3.5 Flash (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Rilis: 2026-05-19 Hunter Alpha Hunter Alpha medium Rilis: 2026-03-11
Skor 9.5 4.7
Peringkat #4 #199
Keandalan 10.0 T/A
Konsistensi 9.3 6.0
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 93.9% 53.0%
Tes tidak stabil 2 6
Total Run 66 52
Biaya per hasil 9.879 0.000
Total Biaya $1.976 $0.000
Harga input $1.500 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Harga output $9.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total token input 107,137 28,927
Token output 8,777 4,682
Token penalaran 192,900 17,969
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 15.07s 10.33s
Waktu respons (maks) 145.92s 30.53s
Waktu respons (total) 331.48s 175.58s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#4 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Biaya
$0.208
Waktu
118.2s
Token
23,158 tok

#199 Hunter Alpha

medium
Hunter Alpha was a stealth model revealed on March 18th as an early testing version of MiMo-V2-Pro. Find it here: https://openrouter.ai/xiaomi/mimo-v2-pro
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.0s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Hunter Alpha 9.8 3.3 0.0% 0 0ms 0 0 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan