Navigasi
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Trinity Large Thinking (low) vs Gemma 4 31B

Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 6.0 vs 6.1. Gemma 4 31B memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.018 vs $0.658. Gemma 4 31B lebih cepat di 5.41s vs 96.61s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 47.0% vs 43.9%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-08-14

Peringkat
#174
Total token output
818,359
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
96.61s
Total Biaya
$0.658
Peringkat
#171
Total token output
13,317
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
5.41s
Total Biaya
$0.018
Model yang direkomendasikan Gemma 4 31B

It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 38.5x less than Trinity Large Thinking (low).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Trinity Large Thinking Trinity Large Thinking low Rilis: 2026-07-28 Gemma 4 31B Gemma 4 31B none Rilis: 2026-04-02 Tersedia gratis
Skor 6.0 6.1
Peringkat #174 #171
Keandalan 10.0 10.0
Konsistensi 8.3 9.6
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 47.0% 43.9%
Tes tidak stabil 5 1
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 8.221 0.366
Total Biaya $0.658 $0.018
Harga input $0.220 / 1M $0.100 / 1M
Harga output $0.850 / 1M $0.340 / 1M
Total token input 122,854 125,703
Token output 119,810 13,317
Token penalaran 698,549 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 96.61s 5.41s
Waktu respons (maks) 540.96s 29.95s
Waktu respons (total) 2125.51s 108.12s
Parameter 398B total (13B aktif) 30.7B
Ketersediaan Bobot tersedia Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#174 Trinity Large Thinking

low
Biaya
$0.021
Waktu
173.2s
Token
24,586 tok

#171 Gemma 4 31B

none
Biaya
$0.001
Waktu
12.8s
Token
795 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Trinity Large Thinking 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 344.45s 5,441 27,039 217,241
Gemma 4 31B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 11.19s 8,381 735 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan