#71 Claude Sonnet 4.6
none- Biaya
- $0.038
- Waktu
- 27.3s
- Token
- 2,598 tok
AI BENCHY Compare
Ringkasan
Seed-2.0-Mini (medium) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 7.4 vs 7.3. Seed-2.0-Mini (medium) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.044 vs $0.316. Claude Sonnet 4.6 lebih cepat di 5.04s vs 80.22s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 55.6% vs 57.1%.
Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-07-14
| Metrik | Claude Sonnet 4.6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Seed-2.0-Mini Seed-2.0-Mini medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 7.3 | 7.4 |
| Peringkat | #71 | #66 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 6.7 |
| Konsistensi | 9.7 | 9.3 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 55.6% | 57.1% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 2 |
| Total Run | 63 | 63 |
| Biaya per hasil | 2.870 | 0.397 |
| Total Biaya | $0.316 | $0.044 |
| Harga input | $3.000 / 1M | $0.100 / 1M |
| Harga output | $15.000 / 1M | $0.400 / 1M |
| Total token input | 57,886 | 41,904 |
| Token output | 9,465 | 2,555 |
| Token penalaran | 0 | 95,974 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 5.04s | 80.22s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 23.84s | 262.83s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 70.60s | 1363.72s |
Showcase generasi
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 5.19s | 8,522 | 2,127 | 0 | |
| Seed-2.0-Mini | 5.5 | 9.8 | 33.3% | 0 | 220.48s | 3,823 | 464 | 34,964 |
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan