- Peringkat
- #21
- Total token output
- 36,457
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 25.88s
- Total Biaya
- $1.266
Claude Opus 5.5 (high) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium)
Skor rata-rata hampir imbang di 9.3 vs 9.2. Claude Opus 5.5 (high) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $1.266 vs $1.352. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) lebih cepat di 20.62s vs 25.88s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 86.4% vs 90.9%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #22
- Total token output
- 97,238
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 20.62s
- Total Biaya
- $1.352
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium)
It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.2) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 high | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.3 | 9.2 |
| Peringkat | #21 | #22 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.3 | 10.0 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 86.4% | 90.9% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 2 | 0 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 7.029 | 6.758 |
| Total Biaya | $1.266 | $1.352 |
| Harga input | $4.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Harga output | $20.000 / 1M | $12.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 134,020 | 92,296 |
| Token output | 7,237 | 5,232 |
| Token penalaran | 29,220 | 92,006 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 25.88s | 20.62s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 95.95s | 88.68s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 569.33s | 329.94s |
| Parameter | ~5T total (~500B aktif) | ~1.2T total (~20B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#21 Claude Opus 5.5
high- Biaya
- $0.136
- Waktu
- 75.6s
- Token
- 6,934 tok
#22 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
medium- Biaya
- $0.115
- Waktu
- 87.2s
- Token
- 9,629 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.58s | 858 | 313 | 683 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.90s | 498 | 112 | 3,218 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.44s | 10,608 | 584 | 5,042 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 7.9 | 9.9 | 66.7% | 0 | 40.17s | 8,124 | 435 | 41,247 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 60.05s | 96,745 | 4,683 | 6,301 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 40.39s | 67,910 | 3,687 | 23,111 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.31s | 10,515 | 312 | 355 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 7.72s | 7,265 | 279 | 3,904 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 30.08s | 990 | 58 | 14,458 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 20.29s | 644 | 18 | 11,704 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.66s | 714 | 283 | 352 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 11.77s | 490 | 108 | 1,179 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.35s | 921 | 96 | 435 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 9.56s | 621 | 72 | 2,236 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 8.7 | 7.7 | 88.9% | 1 | 30.85s | 912 | 496 | 605 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.90s | 570 | 235 | 3,128 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 75.42s | 11,757 | 412 | 989 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 23.15s | 6,018 | 274 | 982 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 27.41s | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.27s | 156 | 12 | 1,297 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Opus 5highvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumClaude Opus 5.5highvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 5.5lowvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumClaude Opus 5.5highvsGPT-5.5lowGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6highGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.5lowClaude Opus 5.5highvsGPT-6 AstramediumClaude Opus 5.5highvsGPT-5.6 SolmediumClaude Opus 5.5highvsGPT-6 SolmediumGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 SolhighGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5.5highvsGemini 3.8 Flashmedium