- Peringkat
- #83
- Total token output
- 61,650
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 7.51s
- Total Biaya
- $0.061
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) vs Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low)
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 8.6 vs 6.3. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.061 vs $0.717. Claude Haiku 5.5 (low) lebih cepat di 7.51s vs 19.02s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 76.8% vs 60.9%.
Model yang Dibandingkan
- Peringkat
- #266
- Total token output
- 425,576
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 19.02s
- Total Biaya
- $0.717
Model yang direkomendasikan
Claude Haiku 5.5 (low)
It has the best score here (8.6), while costing about 11.9x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite (low).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Haiku 5.5 Claude Haiku 5.5 low | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 8.6 | 6.3 |
| Peringkat | #83 | #266 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Percobaan | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 76.8% | 60.9% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 3 | 2 |
| Total Run | 69 | 69 |
| Biaya per hasil | 0.378 | 5.512 |
| Total Biaya | $0.061 | $0.717 |
| Harga input | $0.100 / 1M | $0.250 / 1M |
| Harga output | $0.500 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
| Harga baca cache | $0.010 / 1M | $0.025 / 1M |
| Harga tulis cache | $0.125 / 1M | $0.084 / 1M |
| Total token input | 296,301 | 312,368 |
| Token output | 10,672 | 9,429 |
| Token penalaran | 50,978 | 416,147 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 7.51s | 19.02s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 44.43s | 318.02s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 172.74s | 437.38s |
| Parameter | ~50B | ~150B total (~10B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Harga cache berlaku untuk token input. Pembacaan memakai kembali prompt tersimpan; penulisan menyimpannya dan dapat menambah biaya. Token output menggunakan harga output.
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#83 Claude Haiku 5.5
low- Biaya
- $0.001
- Waktu
- 7.4s
- Token
- 1,851 tok
#266 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite
low- Biaya
- $0.003
- Waktu
- 4.0s
- Token
- 1,479 tok
Rincian Kategori
| Tugas agen | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 44.43s | 153,966 | 2,991 | 3,811 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 79.99s | 218,135 | 1,670 | 26,015 |
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 8.7 | 7.9 | 91.7% | 1 | 2.16s | 858 | 483 | 1,480 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 7.3 | 6.2 | 75.0% | 2 | 1.84s | 500 | 1,013 | 1,548 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 7.9 | 7.5 | 77.8% | 1 | 7.30s | 10,608 | 531 | 11,618 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 1.53s | 8,132 | 471 | 1,072 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 23.94s | 104,796 | 4,741 | 19,543 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.2 | 9.1 | 0.0% | 0 | 161.25s | 70,202 | 5,375 | 381,841 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.45s | 10,515 | 312 | 1,609 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.44s | 7,453 | 291 | 697 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 5.9 | 7.2 | 55.6% | 1 | 7.35s | 990 | 64 | 9,207 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 1.44s | 648 | 15 | 1,220 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 4.6 | 9.8 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.38s | 714 | 319 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 4.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.37s | 492 | 69 | 438 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.20s | 921 | 94 | 515 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.52s | 619 | 72 | 760 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 2.76s | 912 | 611 | 1,783 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.40s | 570 | 210 | 1,191 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.19s | 11,757 | 354 | 459 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.66s | 5,457 | 234 | 945 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.70s | 264 | 172 | 953 | |
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 1.46s | 160 | 9 | 420 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Gemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsSolar Pro 4highGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsMinimax M3.1 FlashmediumTersedia gratisGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsSpace Bunny AlphamediumClaude Haiku 5.5lowvsGPT-6.1 TerranoneDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.6 27BnoneClaude Haiku 5.5lowvsGrok 4.6highGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsQwen3.5-35B-A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsLongCat 2.0noneDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowvsGrok 4.20medium