- Peringkat
- #18
- Total token output
- 40,071
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 13.59s
- Total Biaya
- $3.364
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (low)
Claude Fable 5.1 (high) unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 9.0 vs 8.8. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.449 vs $3.364. Gemini 3.5 Flash (low) lebih cepat di 5.76s vs 13.59s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 89.4% vs 84.9%.
- Peringkat
- #25
- Total token output
- 35,195
- Waktu respons (rata-rata)
- 5.76s
- Total Biaya
- $0.449
Model yang direkomendasikan
Gemini 3.5 Flash (low)
Its score stays close to the best score here (8.8 vs 9.0), while costing about 7.5x less than Claude Fable 5.1 (high).
Perbandingan terperinci
| Metrik | Claude Fable 5.1 Claude Fable 5.1 high | Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash low |
|---|---|---|
| Skor | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Peringkat | #18 | #25 |
| Keandalan | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Konsistensi | 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Percobaan | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tes benar | ||
| Tingkat lulus per percobaan | 89.4% | 84.9% |
| Tes tidak stabil | 1 | 2 |
| Total Run | 66 | 66 |
| Biaya per hasil | 17.701 | 2.492 |
| Total Biaya | $3.364 | $0.449 |
| Harga input | $10.000 / 1M | $1.500 / 1M |
| Harga output | $50.000 / 1M | $9.000 / 1M |
| Total token input | 135,958 | 87,826 |
| Token output | 7,930 | 2,239 |
| Token penalaran | 32,141 | 32,956 |
| Waktu respons (rata-rata) | 13.59s | 5.76s |
| Waktu respons (maks) | 40.17s | 53.55s |
| Waktu respons (total) | 298.90s | 126.71s |
| Parameter | ~9.5T total (~878B aktif) | ~500B total (~20B aktif) |
| Ketersediaan | Tertutup | Tertutup |
Showcase generasi model
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#18 Claude Fable 5.1
high- Biaya
- $0.384
- Waktu
- 102.5s
- Token
- 7,824 tok
#25 Gemini 3.5 Flash
low- Biaya
- $0.068
- Waktu
- 39.1s
- Token
- 7,588 tok
Model teratas berdasarkan skor
Skor vs Total Biaya
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)
Total token output
Skor vs Total token output
Rincian Kategori
| Trik anti-AI | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.90s | 858 | 287 | 790 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.52s | 494 | 209 | 2,536 |
| Pemrograman | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.91s | 10,608 | 520 | 6,503 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 6.71s | 8,118 | 458 | 13,420 |
| Gabungan | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 34.59s | 98,419 | 5,484 | 5,373 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 8.2 | 6.9 | 66.7% | 1 | 29.99s | 63,752 | 557 | 3,713 |
| Parsing dan ekstraksi data | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.30s | 10,515 | 312 | 403 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.81s | 7,548 | 279 | 1,164 |
| Spesifik domain | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 24.34s | 990 | 63 | 12,436 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 4.89s | 642 | 12 | 6,312 |
| Kecerdasan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.40s | 714 | 291 | 0 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.27s | 486 | 119 | 916 |
| Kepatuhan instruksi | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.60s | 921 | 97 | 263 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 9.9 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.86s | 615 | 71 | 1,652 |
| Pemecahan teka-teki | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.11s | 912 | 506 | 558 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.35s | 558 | 288 | 2,150 |
| Pemanggilan alat | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 13.30s | 11,757 | 354 | 118 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.27s | 5,457 | 234 | 403 |
| Pengetahuan umum | Skor | Konsistensi | Tingkat lulus per percobaan | Tes tidak stabil | Tes benar | Waktu respons (rata-rata) | Token input | Token output | Token penalaran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Fable 5.1 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 30.58s | 264 | 16 | 5,697 | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.88s | 156 | 12 | 690 |
Perbandingan Cepat
Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan
Claude Fable 5.1highvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.5mediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.8 MaxmediumClaude Fable 5.1highvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumClaude Opus 4.8mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowClaude Fable 5.1highvsSeed 2.1 TurbolowSeed 2.1 TurbohighvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowClaude Fable 5.1highvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGLM 5.3 FlashmaxClaude Opus 4.7mediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashlowGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsMuse Spark 1.2high