Catégorie AI BENCHY
Classement Appel d'outils
Voyez quels modèles d'IA réussissent le mieux sur Appel d'outils, lesquels restent fiables et où les écarts sont les plus marqués. Trier par: Tests corrects ↓.
| Rang | Modèle | Entreprise | Score Appel d'outils | Score | Tests corrects | Temps de réponse (moy.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #17 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | 1/1 | 3.80s | |
| #18 | GLM 5 Turbo medium | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 9.84s |
| #19 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 4.60s |
| #20 | Qwen3.6 Plus medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 5.87s |
| #21 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview none | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 3.35s | |
| #22 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 9.54s | |
| #23 | MiMo-V2-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 8.1 | 1/1 | 8.19s |
| #24 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 10.0 | 8.0 | 1/1 | 9.01s | |
| #26 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.0 | 1/1 | 7.48s |
| #27 | DeepSeek V3.2 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 8.0 | 1/1 | 34.8s |
| #28 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | 1/1 | 4.68s |
| #29 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 10.0 | 7.9 | 1/1 | 3.39s | |
| #30 | Step 3.5 Flash medium | Stepfun | 10.0 | 7.9 | 1/1 | 11.9s |
| #32 | Qwen3.5-Flash medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | 1/1 | 10.3s |
| #34 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.7 | 1/1 | 8.92s |