Ranking de Combinado
Mira qué modelos de IA rinden mejor en Combinado, cuáles se mantienen fiables y dónde aparecen las mayores diferencias. Ordenar por: Pruebas correctas ↓.
Motivos de fallo
451/451
Filtrar modelos
Ningún modelo coincide con la búsqueda y los filtros actuales.
| Rango | Modelo | Empresa | Puntuación de Combinado | Puntuación | Costo total | Pruebas correctas | Tiempo de respuesta (promedio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #287 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.114 | 0/2 | 25.6s |
| #288 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.080 | 0/2 | 7.75s | |
| #290 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite none | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.069 | 0/2 | 9.49s | |
| #291 | Qwen3.6 Flash none | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.139 | 0/2 | 26.5s |
| #293 | Nemotron 3 Ultra none | NVIDIA | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.164 | 0/2 | 21.1s |
| #294 | Qwen3.7 Flash none | Qwen | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.028 | 0/2 | 94.6s |
| #295 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next none | Qwen | 0.3 | 0.6 | ~$0.011 | 0/2 | 12.0s |
| #296 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 none | DeepSeek | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.055 | 0/2 | 7.51s |
| #297 | GPT-5.6 Terra none | OpenAI | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.377 | 0/2 | 7.02s |
| #298 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash none | DeepSeek | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.391 | 0/2 | 10.4s |
| #299 | Ling 3.0 Flash high | Inclusionai | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.021 | 0/2 | 50.4s |
| #301 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.794 | 0/2 | 262.4s |
| #304 | Mistral Large 4 none | Mistral | 0.3 | 0.6 | $0.290 | 0/2 | 36.9s |
| #305 | Seed 2.1 Turbo none | Bytedance Seed | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.182 | 0/2 | 41.3s |
| #307 | Gemma 4 31B none | 0.4 | 0.6 | $0.031 | 0/2 | 30.0s |