Ranking de Combinado
Mira qué modelos de IA rinden mejor en Combinado, cuáles se mantienen fiables y dónde aparecen las mayores diferencias. Ordenar por: Pruebas correctas ↓.
Motivos de fallo
311/311
Filtrar modelos
Ningún modelo coincide con la búsqueda y los filtros actuales.
| Rango | Modelo | Empresa | Puntuación de Combinado | Puntuación | Costo total | Pruebas correctas | Tiempo de respuesta (promedio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #269 | Ring-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.026 | 0/2 | 0ms |
| #271 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.041 | 0/2 | 14.7s |
| #272 | Trinity Large Thinking high | Arcee AI | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.592 | 0/2 | 262.4s |
| #273 | Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta medium | X AI | 1.5 | 4.8 | $5.599 | 0/1 | 0ms |
| #274 | KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 none | Kwaipilot | 3.8 | 4.8 | $0.070 | 0/2 | 73.0s |
| #275 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.016 | 0/2 | 50.2s |
| #276 | Trinity Large Preview none | Arcee AI | 1.5 | 4.8 | $0.008 | 0/1 | 8.91s |
| #277 | Hunter Alpha medium | OpenRouter | 2.3 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 0/1 | 30.5s |
| #279 | Laguna M.1 medium | Poolside | 1.5 | 4.7 | $0.033 | 0/1 | 53.1s |
| #280 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 1.5 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 0/1 | 47.4s |
| #281 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 3.0 | 4.7 | $0.030 | 0/2 | 2.56s |
| #282 | Granite 4.2 8B high | IBM Granite | 5.0 | 4.6 | $0.084 | 0/2 | 570.4s |
| #283 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 3.0 | 4.6 | $0.034 | 0/2 | 14.6s |
| #284 | MiniMax M2.5 medium | Minimax | 3.7 | 4.6 | $0.327 | 0/2 | 83.2s |
| #285 | Laguna S 2.1 none | Poolside | 2.9 | 4.5 | $0.022 | 0/2 | 21.6s |