Ranking de Combinado
Mira qué modelos de IA rinden mejor en Combinado, cuáles se mantienen fiables y dónde aparecen las mayores diferencias. Ordenar por: Pruebas correctas ↓.
Motivos de fallo
451/451
Filtrar modelos
Ningún modelo coincide con la búsqueda y los filtros actuales.
| Rango | Modelo | Empresa | Puntuación de Combinado | Puntuación | Costo total | Pruebas correctas | Tiempo de respuesta (promedio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #122 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B high | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.8 | $2.949 | 1/2 | 266.1s |
| #123 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.218 | 1/2 | 20.7s |
| #125 | Ling 3.1 Flash high | Inclusionai | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 351.2s |
| #128 | GLM 5.3 high | Z.ai | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.495 | 1/2 | 64.0s |
| #129 | Step 3.7 Flash medium | Stepfun | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.571 | 1/2 | 80.9s |
| #132 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 0.7 | 0.8 | $1.345 | 1/2 | 12.8s |
| #133 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium | DeepSeek | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.460 | 1/2 | 150.6s |
| #136 | Muse Glimmer 30B high | Meta | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.506 | 1/2 | 115.4s |
| #137 | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL medium | NVIDIA | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.437 | 1/2 | 112.2s |
| #138 | Claude Haiku 5.5 medium | Anthropic | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.063 | 1/2 | 20.3s |
| #139 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 medium | Qwen | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.435 | 1/2 | 92.4s |
| #140 | Qwen3.7 Flash low | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.8 | $0.071 | 1/2 | 217.8s |
| #141 | Muse Glimmer 30B medium | Meta | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.288 | 1/2 | 76.5s |
| #143 | Qwen3.8 Flash Next medium | Qwen | 0.6 | 0.8 | ~$0.047 | 1/2 | 76.7s |
| #144 | GPT-6 Luna low | OpenAI | 0.7 | 0.8 | $0.033 | 1/2 | 49.8s |