Ranking de Programación
Mira qué modelos de IA rinden mejor en Programación, cuáles se mantienen fiables y dónde aparecen las mayores diferencias. Ordenar por: Métrica ↑.
Modelos mostrados
15
Promedio de Puntuación de Programación
6.1
Mejor modelo
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview 0.0
292/292
Filtrar modelos
Ningún modelo coincide con la búsqueda y los filtros actuales.
| Rango | Modelo | Empresa | Puntuación de Programación | Puntuación | Costo total | Pruebas correctas | Tiempo de respuesta (promedio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #17 | Qwen3.7 Max medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.157 | 3/3 | 35.3s |
| #20 | Qwen3.8 Max medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 9.0 | $0.771 | 3/3 | 41.3s |
| #21 | Grok 4.5 high | X AI | 10.0 | 9.0 | $2.252 | 3/3 | 155.2s |
| #22 | GPT-5.3-Codex medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.9 | $0.988 | 3/3 | 19.5s |
| #23 | Seed 2.1 Turbo high | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.9 | $1.797 | 3/3 | 336.0s |
| #26 | Claude Opus 4.8 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.8 | $1.983 | 3/3 | 15.3s |
| #29 | GLM 5.3 Flash max | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.7 | $0.059 | 3/3 | 43.4s |
| #31 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.771 | 3/3 | 22.2s |
| #32 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.339 | 3/3 | 17.5s |
| #33 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 3/3 | 15.7s |
| #34 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.6 | $3.004 | 3/3 | 15.6s |
| #41 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.945 | 3/3 | 13.7s |
| #42 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.182 | 3/3 | 22.7s |
| #45 | Inkling Small high | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.398 | 3/3 | 93.2s |
| #46 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.673 | 3/3 | 10.3s |