Ranking de Programación
Mira qué modelos de IA rinden mejor en Programación, cuáles se mantienen fiables y dónde aparecen las mayores diferencias. Ordenar por: Costo total ↑.
Modelos mostrados
15
Promedio de Puntuación de Programación
6.1
Mejor modelo
Dots 3 Note Preview 5.9
292/292
Filtrar modelos
Ningún modelo coincide con la búsqueda y los filtros actuales.
| Rango | Modelo | Empresa | Puntuación de Programación | Puntuación | Costo total | Pruebas correctas | Tiempo de respuesta (promedio) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #106 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 5.5 | 7.3 | $1.166 | 1/3 | 3.29s |
| #42 | GPT-5.2 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.182 | 3/3 | 22.7s |
| #131 | Step 3.7 Flash high | Stepfun | 4.0 | 6.8 | $1.229 | 0/3 | 206.2s |
| #107 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 5.7 | 7.2 | $1.247 | 1/3 | 214.4s |
| #10 | GPT-5.5 low | OpenAI | 10.0 | 9.3 | $1.257 | 3/3 | 15.0s |
| #128 | Seed-2.0-Code high | Bytedance Seed | 6.2 | 6.9 | $1.273 | 1/3 | 266.7s |
| #32 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.339 | 3/3 | 17.5s |
| #12 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium | 7.9 | 9.2 | $1.352 | 2/3 | 40.2s | |
| #33 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 3/3 | 15.7s |
| #56 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 6.4 | 8.0 | $1.463 | 1/3 | 73.0s |
| #30 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 7.6 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/3 | 13.0s |
| #16 | Seed 2.1 Turbo low | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 9.1 | $1.546 | 3/3 | 360.8s |
| #82 | Claude Opus 5 none | Anthropic | 5.9 | 7.5 | $1.550 | 1/3 | 5.54s |
| #37 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 8.8 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/3 | 44.4s |
| #15 | Claude Opus 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 9.2 | $1.586 | 3/3 | 9.56s |