Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.8 Max (low) vs Grok 4.6 (medium)

Qwen3.8 Max (low) leads on average score with 8.6 vs 8.4. Qwen3.8 Max (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.702 vs $1.713. Qwen3.8 Max (low) is faster at 21.83s vs 73.46s, with pass rates of 80.3% vs 81.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#35
Total Output Tokens
83,821
Response Time (avg)
21.83s
Total Cost
$0.702
Rank
#39
Total Output Tokens
249,808
Response Time (avg)
73.46s
Total Cost
$1.713
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Max (low)

It has the best score here (8.6), while costing about 2.4x less than Grok 4.6 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3.8 Max low Release: 2026-08-04 Grok 4.6 Grok 4.6 medium Release: 2026-08-12
Score 8.6 8.4
Rank #35 #39
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 8.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 80.3% 81.8%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.384 10.703
Total Cost $0.702 $1.713
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 99,181 106,787
Output Tokens 6,132 4,811
Reasoning Tokens 77,689 244,997
Response Time (avg) 21.83s 73.46s
Response Time (max) 155.75s 514.35s
Response Time (total) 480.37s 1616.12s
Parameters 2.4T total (~100B active) ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#35 Qwen3.8 Max

low
Cost
$0.026
Time
68.5s
Tokens
4,280 tok

#39 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.6

medium
Cost
$0.028
Time
72.1s
Tokens
4,771 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Max 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 28.69s 8,127 512 15,952
Grok 4.6 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 120.05s 9,579 351 64,226

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair