Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.2 (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Max (low)

Qwen3.8 Max (low) leads on average score with 8.7 vs 8.4. Qwen3.8 Max (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.687 vs $0.951. Qwen3.8 Max (low) is faster at 21.19s vs 22.62s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 84.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-04

Rank
#30
Total Output Tokens
54,782
Response Time (avg)
22.62s
Total Cost
$0.951
Rank
#23
Total Output Tokens
81,411
Response Time (avg)
21.19s
Total Cost
$0.687
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Max (low)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (8.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.2 GPT-5.2 medium Release: 2025-12-11 Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3.8 Max low Release: 2026-08-04
Score 8.4 8.7
Rank #30 #23
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.5 9.0
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 84.9%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.791 4.041
Total Cost $0.951 $0.687
Input Price $1.750 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $14.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 105,004 99,172
Output Tokens 9,914 6,132
Reasoning Tokens 44,868 75,279
Response Time (avg) 22.62s 21.19s
Response Time (max) 102.93s 155.75s
Response Time (total) 339.28s 466.14s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#30 GPT-5.2

medium
Cost
$0.047
Time
49.2s
Tokens
3,396 tok

#23 Qwen3.8 Max

low
Cost
$0.026
Time
68.5s
Tokens
4,280 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.73s 7,302 511 11,912
Qwen3.8 Max 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 28.69s 8,127 512 15,952

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair