Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.8 Max (low) vs Grok 4.5 (high)

Grok 4.5 (high) leads on average score with 8.9 vs 8.7. Qwen3.8 Max (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.687 vs $1.707. Qwen3.8 Max (low) is faster at 21.19s vs 76.50s, with pass rates of 84.9% vs 83.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-04

Rank
#23
Total Output Tokens
81,411
Response Time (avg)
21.19s
Total Cost
$0.687
Rank
#17
Total Output Tokens
253,195
Response Time (avg)
76.50s
Total Cost
$1.707
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Max (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.7 vs 8.9), while costing about 2.5x less than Grok 4.5 (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3.8 Max low Release: 2026-08-04 Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 high Release: 2026-07-08
Score 8.7 8.9
Rank #23 #17
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 9.2
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.9% 83.3%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.041 10.041
Total Cost $0.687 $1.707
Input Price $2.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 99,172 151,562
Output Tokens 6,132 5,655
Reasoning Tokens 75,279 247,540
Response Time (avg) 21.19s 76.50s
Response Time (max) 155.75s 676.83s
Response Time (total) 466.14s 1683.07s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#23 Qwen3.8 Max

low
Cost
$0.026
Time
68.5s
Tokens
4,280 tok

#17 xAI: Grok 4.5

high
Cost
$0.015
Time
29.7s
Tokens
2,737 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Max 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 28.69s 8,127 512 15,952
Grok 4.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 155.16s 9,579 357 100,752

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair