Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.6 vs 7.5. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.047 vs $1.546. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) is faster at 24.79s vs 66.38s, with pass rates of 75.4% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#119
Total Output Tokens
143,965
Response Time (avg)
24.79s
Total Cost
~$0.047
Rank
#123
Total Output Tokens
248,708
Response Time (avg)
66.38s
Total Cost
$1.546
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium)

It has the best score here (7.6), while costing about 32.9x less than GLM 5.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next medium Release: 2026-10-04 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.6 7.5
Rank #119 #123
Reliability 10.0 9.2
Consistency 7.9 8.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.4% 66.7%
Flaky tests 6 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result ~0.314 9.004
Total Cost ~$0.047 $1.546
Input Price N/A $1.400 / 1M
Output Price N/A $4.400 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.260 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 278,792 331,577
Output Tokens 1,695 17,919
Reasoning Tokens 142,270 230,789
Response Time (avg) 24.79s 66.38s
Response Time (max) 159.62s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 570.26s 1460.31s
Parameters 180B total (6B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Weights available Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#119 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
40.7s
Tokens
4,059 tok

#123 GLM 5.1

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 45.53s 7,893 346 37,643
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-6 LunalowvsQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumSpace Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumvsSpace Bunny AlphahighQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailablevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-6 LunalowvsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsGLM 5.1mediumMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumGPT-6 LunahighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextmediumGrok 4.7lowvsGLM 5.1mediumQwen3.7 FlashlowvsGLM 5.1medium