Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.7 Flash (low) vs Grok 4.5 (low)

Grok 4.5 (low) leads on average score with 7.8 vs 7.7. Qwen3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.071 vs $1.345. Grok 4.5 (low) is faster at 18.14s vs 41.03s, with pass rates of 68.1% vs 73.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-06

Compared models

Rank
#117
Total Output Tokens
331,107
Response Time (avg)
41.03s
Total Cost
$0.071
Rank
#112
Total Output Tokens
121,415
Response Time (avg)
18.14s
Total Cost
$1.345
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Flash (low)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.7 vs 7.8), while costing about 19.1x less than Grok 4.5 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.7 Flash Qwen3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-07-28 Grok 4.5 Grok 4.5 low Release: 2026-07-08
Score 7.7 7.8
Rank #117 #112
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.1% 73.9%
Flaky tests 6 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.439 8.404
Total Cost $0.071 $1.345
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.130 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.006 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Cache Write Price $0.039 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 318,058 308,068
Output Tokens 16,035 9,218
Reasoning Tokens 315,072 112,197
Response Time (avg) 41.03s 18.14s
Response Time (max) 394.54s 205.28s
Response Time (total) 943.75s 417.21s
Parameters ~35B total (~3B active) ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#117 Qwen3.7 Flash

low
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#112 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.5

low
Cost
$0.011
Time
12.4s
Tokens
2,018 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.7 Flash 6.7 7.8 55.6% 1 42.36s 7,893 428 56,419
Grok 4.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.72s 9,579 303 15,641

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumvsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.7 PlusnonevsGrok 4.5lowMuse Glimmer 30BmediumvsQwen3.7 FlashlowMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowGPT-6 LunahighvsQwen3.7 FlashlowStep 3.7 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.5lowGrok 4.5lowvsGLM 5.3highGPT-6 LunahighvsGrok 4.5lowMuse Glimmer 30BhighvsGrok 4.5lowLing 3.1 FlashhighvsGrok 4.5lowQwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20mediumvsGrok 4.5lowGrok 4.5lowvsMiMo-V2.6-Flashmedium