Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)

GLM 5.1 (medium) leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.4. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.783 vs $1.546. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) is faster at 45.45s vs 66.38s, with pass rates of 68.1% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#127
Total Output Tokens
652,280
Response Time (avg)
45.45s
Total Cost
$0.783
Rank
#123
Total Output Tokens
248,708
Response Time (avg)
66.38s
Total Cost
$1.546
Recommended model Qwen3.6 Flash (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.4 vs 7.5), while costing about 2.0x less than GLM 5.1 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-04-20 GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium Release: 2026-04-07
Score 7.4 7.5
Rank #127 #123
Reliability 10.0 9.2
Consistency 8.3 8.4
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.1% 66.7%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 6.594 9.004
Total Cost $0.783 $1.546
Input Price $0.188 / 1M $1.400 / 1M
Output Price $1.125 / 1M $4.400 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.260 / 1M
Cache Write Price $0.235 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 258,760 331,577
Output Tokens 22,221 17,919
Reasoning Tokens 630,059 230,789
Response Time (avg) 45.45s 66.38s
Response Time (max) 578.13s 308.75s
Response Time (total) 1045.45s 1460.31s
Parameters ~35B total (~3B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#127 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.008
Time
29.9s
Tokens
6,784 tok

#123 GLM 5.1

medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967
GLM 5.1 4.6 3.7 44.5% 2 109.63s 5,702 4,871 37,826

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Space Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731lowvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashXhighQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsGrok 4.7lowQwen3.8 27BlowFree AvailablevsGLM 5.1mediumGPT-6 LunalowvsGLM 5.1mediumQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsInkling SmallhighFree AvailableDeepSeek V4 Pro 0423nonevsQwen3.6 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsQwen3.6 FlashmediumSeed-2.0-CodehighvsGLM 5.1mediumQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashhighQwen3.6 FlashmediumvsSpace Bunny Alphahigh