Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.6 27B vs Space Bunny Alpha (medium)

Qwen3.6 27B leads on average score with 6.3 vs 6.3. Space Bunny Alpha (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.147. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 12.71s vs 32.88s, with pass rates of 47.8% vs 55.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#213
Total Output Tokens
20,816
Response Time (avg)
12.71s
Total Cost
$0.147
Rank
#220
Total Output Tokens
192,115
Response Time (avg)
32.88s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Qwen3.6 27B

It has the best score here (6.3), while responding about 2.6x faster than Space Bunny Alpha (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20 Space Bunny Alpha Space Bunny Alpha medium Release: 2026-09-24
Score 6.3 6.3
Rank #213 #220
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.7 8.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.8% 55.1%
Flaky tests 6 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.874 0.000
Total Cost $0.147 $0.000
Input Price $0.320 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $3.200 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 250,919 267,840
Output Tokens 20,816 192,115
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 12.71s 32.88s
Response Time (max) 156.31s 197.32s
Response Time (total) 292.29s 756.28s
Parameters 27B -
Availability Open source Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#213 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

#220 Space Bunny Alpha

medium
Cost
$0.000
Time
35.4s
Tokens
4,894 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0
Space Bunny Alpha 5.4 7.2 44.4% 1 6.82s 8,493 6,691 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair