Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Summary

Qwen3.5-Flash vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro benchmark comparison: Qwen3.5-Flash leads on average score with 6.1 vs 5.5. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.005 vs $0.017. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is faster at 1.78s vs 3.58s, with pass rates of 39.7% vs 39.7%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.5-Flash - It has the best score here (6.1), while costing about 3.9x less than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Last updated at: 2026-06-18

Metric Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 6.1 5.5
Rank #97 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.7 8.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 39.7% 39.7%
Flaky tests 1 4
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.075 0.648
Total Cost $0.005 $0.017
Input Price $0.065 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $0.260 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 46,439 30,724
Output Tokens 4,276 3,043
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.58s 1.78s
Response Time (max) 27.18s 8.32s
Response Time (total) 75.28s 37.42s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#97 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

#119 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.5 8.3 8.3% 1 1.32s 696 690 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.3 8.1 8.3% 1 2.67s 645 994 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 6.22s 18,879 1,794 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.54s 4,695 596 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.57s 7,794 243 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.32s 7,758 249 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 905ms 789 15 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 877ms 753 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 803ms 522 100 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.58s 498 87 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 8.81s 711 63 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.4 10.0 50.0% 0 1.03s 684 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 10.89s 714 579 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 6.7 4.7 77.8% 2 1.30s 678 267 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.67s 8,211 264 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.30s 8,238 258 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 588ms 210 9 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 1.89s 216 14 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair