Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-27B vs GLM 5.3 Flash (high)

GLM 5.3 Flash (high) leads on average score with 7.3 vs 7.2. GLM 5.3 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.084 vs $0.116. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 9.98s vs 29.11s, with pass rates of 47.8% vs 66.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-01

Compared models

Rank
#139
Total Output Tokens
36,422
Response Time (avg)
9.98s
Total Cost
$0.116
Rank
#132
Total Output Tokens
99,340
Response Time (avg)
29.11s
Total Cost
$0.084
Recommended model Qwen3.5-27B

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.2 vs 7.3), while responding about 2.9x faster than GLM 5.3 Flash (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24 GLM 5.3 Flash GLM 5.3 Flash high Release: 2026-08-26
Score 7.2 7.3
Rank #139 #132
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.4 8.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 47.8% 66.7%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.153 0.426
Total Cost $0.116 $0.084
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $0.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 283,977 225,013
Output Tokens 36,422 12,197
Reasoning Tokens 0 87,143
Response Time (avg) 9.98s 29.11s
Response Time (max) 124.53s 163.41s
Response Time (total) 229.52s 669.54s
Parameters 27B 320B total (18B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#139 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

#132 GLM 5.3 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
186.7s
Tokens
10,486 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
GLM 5.3 Flash 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 19.62s 7,317 373 9,973

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair