Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Summary

Qwen3.5-27B vs MiMo-V2.5 benchmark comparison: Qwen3.5-27B leads on average score with 5.7 vs 4.9. MiMo-V2.5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.007 vs $0.015. Qwen3.5-27B is faster at 1.68s vs 2.20s, with pass rates of 38.1% vs 27.0%.

Recommended model: MiMo-V2.5 - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (4.9), lower cost than Qwen3.5-27B, and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-06-04

Metric Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Release: 2026-02-24 MiMo-V2.5 MiMo-V2.5 none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.7 4.9
Rank #115 #143
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 38.1% 27.0%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.249 0.413
Total Cost $0.015 $0.007
Input Price $0.195 / 1M $0.140 / 1M
Output Price $1.560 / 1M $0.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 44,478 41,985
Output Tokens 3,592 2,267
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.68s 2.20s
Response Time (max) 9.39s 6.86s
Response Time (total) 35.25s 46.21s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#115 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
42.9s
Tokens
4,273 tok

#143 MiMo-V2.5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
267.4s
Tokens
25,283 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 4.8 10.0 25.0% 0 788ms 696 267 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.5 8.0 16.7% 1 2.19s 645 282 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 3.24s 7,440 696 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 2.8 1.6 33.3% 1 9.39s 16,918 1,461 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.36s 15,075 330 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 1.43s 7,794 243 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 1.01s 7,758 366 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 540ms 789 15 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 756ms 753 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 5.0 10.0 0.0% 0 2.51s 522 126 0
MiMo-V2.5 4.4 9.9 0.0% 0 6.86s 498 81 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 1.03s 711 69 0
MiMo-V2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 751ms 684 72 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 6.7 7.9 55.6% 1 1.38s 714 683 0
MiMo-V2.5 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 2.13s 678 166 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 3.54s 8,211 303 0
MiMo-V2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.43s 8,238 231 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 599ms 210 10 0
MiMo-V2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.89s 216 16 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair