Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs GLM 5

GLM 5 leads on average score with 5.7 vs 5.7. GLM 5 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.027 vs $0.283. GLM 5 is faster at 4.03s vs 12.93s, with pass rates of 33.3% vs 42.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-15

Rank
#202
Total Output Tokens
88,459
Response Time (avg)
12.93s
Total Cost
$0.283
Rank
#197
Total Output Tokens
1,989
Response Time (avg)
4.03s
Total Cost
$0.027
Recommended model GLM 5

It has the best score here (5.7), while costing about 10.8x less than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B.

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.5-122B-A10B Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Release: 2026-02-24 GLM 5 GLM 5 none Release: 2026-02-12
Score 5.7 5.7
Rank #202 #197
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.3
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 33.3% 42.4%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 4.182 0.263
Total Cost $0.283 $0.027
Input Price $0.290 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Output Price $2.400 / 1M $1.920 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 241,575 37,135
Output Tokens 88,459 1,989
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 12.93s 4.03s
Response Time (max) 212.63s 11.07s
Response Time (total) 284.39s 56.37s
Parameters 122B total (10B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#202 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
44.5s
Tokens
6,431 tok

#197 GLM 5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
32.1s
Tokens
2,023 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 3.7 7.0 22.2% 1 2.77s 7,913 693 0
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair