Navigate
Advertise here

GPT-6 Luna (medium) vs GLM 5.2 (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.8. GPT-6 Luna (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.031 vs $0.151. GPT-6 Luna (medium) is faster at 15.87s vs 23.28s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 80.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-23

Compared models

Rank
#94
Total Output Tokens
45,154
Response Time (avg)
15.87s
Total Cost
$0.031
Rank
#98
Total Output Tokens
61,761
Response Time (avg)
23.28s
Total Cost
$0.151
Recommended model GPT-6 Luna (medium)

It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 4.9x less than GLM 5.2 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-6 Luna GPT-6 Luna medium Release: 2026-09-23 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.9 7.8
Rank #94 #98
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 8.9 8.0
Attempts 66/66 63/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.218 2.159
Total Cost $0.031 $0.151
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.650 / 1M
Output Price $0.500 / 1M $2.042 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 78,946 37,199
Output Tokens 4,635 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 40,519 49,500
Response Time (avg) 15.87s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 35.14s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 349.09s 488.94s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) 744B total (40B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#94 GPT-6 Luna

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
23.6s
Tokens
2,966 tok

#98 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-6 Luna 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 23.63s 7,302 438 10,222
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair