Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.6 Luna vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

The average score is effectively tied at 5.4 vs 5.4. GPT-5.6 Luna has the lower benchmark cost at $0.029 vs $0.068. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 4.24s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 33.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-04

Rank
#241
Total Output Tokens
6,709
Response Time (avg)
1.50s
Total Cost
$0.029
Rank
#242
Total Output Tokens
15,362
Response Time (avg)
4.24s
Total Cost
$0.068
Recommended model GPT-5.6 Luna

It has the best score here (5.4), while costing about 2.4x less than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09 MiMo-V2.5-Pro MiMo-V2.5-Pro none Release: 2026-04-22
Score 5.4 5.4
Rank #241 #242
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 8.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 33.3%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.357 1.808
Total Cost $0.029 $0.068
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.435 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.870 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,332 124,808
Output Tokens 6,709 15,362
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.50s 4.24s
Response Time (max) 10.57s 53.13s
Response Time (total) 33.05s 93.28s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) 1.02T total (42B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#241 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

#242 MiMo-V2.5-Pro

none
Cost
$0.004
Time
46.4s
Tokens
4,025 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0
MiMo-V2.5-Pro 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 1.41s 6,559 485 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair