Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.7. Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.267 vs $1.017. GPT-5.6 Luna (high) is faster at 18.68s vs 51.51s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 75.8%.

Recommended modelQwen3.7 Plus (medium)It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 3.8x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna high Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Release: 2026-06-03
Score 7.7 7.9
Rank #42 #34
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 75.8%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 6.780 2.072
Total Cost $1.017 $0.267
Input Price $1.000 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Output Price $6.000 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,918 115,233
Output Tokens 5,088 6,162
Reasoning Tokens 150,910 173,267
Response Time (avg) 18.68s 51.51s
Response Time (max) 111.09s 315.30s
Response Time (total) 411.05s 1133.15s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#42 GPT-5.6 Luna

high
Cost
$0.033
Time
34.2s
Tokens
5,484 tok

#34 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Cost
$0.018
Time
193.2s
Tokens
10,821 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 4.7 55.6% 2 15.63s 7,302 510 17,746
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair