Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.5 (low) vs Step 3.7 Flash (medium)

GPT-5.5 (low) leads on average score with 9.3 vs 8.0. Step 3.7 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.515 vs $1.253. GPT-5.5 (low) is faster at 10.13s vs 26.37s, with pass rates of 86.4% vs 72.7%.

Last updated at: 2026-07-28

Rank
#9
Total Output Tokens
28,418
Response Time (avg)
10.13s
Total Cost
$1.253
Rank
#36
Total Output Tokens
427,572
Response Time (avg)
26.37s
Total Cost
$0.515
Recommended model GPT-5.5 (low)

It has the best score here (9.3), while responding about 2.6x faster than Step 3.7 Flash (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Release: 2026-04-24 Step 3.7 Flash Step 3.7 Flash medium Release: 2026-05-29
Score 9.3 8.0
Rank #9 #36
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 10.0 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 86.4% 72.7%
Flaky tests 0 3
Total Runs 66 64
Cost per result 6.594 3.676
Total Cost $1.253 $0.515
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Output Price $30.000 / 1M $1.150 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 80,058 114,062
Output Tokens 5,378 427,572
Reasoning Tokens 23,040 0
Response Time (avg) 10.13s 26.37s
Response Time (max) 56.19s 152.83s
Response Time (total) 222.82s 580.25s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#9 GPT-5.5

low
Cost
$0.068
Time
37.0s
Tokens
2,339 tok

#36 Step 3.7 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.006
Time
46.2s
Tokens
4,466 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402
Step 3.7 Flash 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 27.42s 7,437 44,797 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair