Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Nemotron 3 Ultra vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Nemotron 3 Ultra leads on average score with 6.1 vs 6.0. Qwen3.5-Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.073 vs $0.095. Nemotron 3 Ultra is faster at 3.88s vs 25.28s, with pass rates of 42.4% vs 34.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-26

Rank
#182
Total Output Tokens
9,470
Response Time (avg)
3.88s
Total Cost
$0.095
Rank
#189
Total Output Tokens
209,201
Response Time (avg)
25.28s
Total Cost
$0.073
Recommended model Nemotron 3 Ultra

It has the best score here (6.1), while responding about 6.5x faster than Qwen3.5-Flash.

Detailed comparison

Metric Nemotron 3 Ultra Nemotron 3 Ultra none Release: 2026-06-04 Free Available Qwen3.5-Flash Qwen3.5-Flash none Release: 2026-02-24
Score 6.1 6.0
Rank #182 #189
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 42.4% 34.9%
Flaky tests 2 2
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 1.066
Total Cost $0.095 $0.073
Input Price $0.600 / 1M $0.065 / 1M
Output Price $3.600 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,168 282,356
Output Tokens 9,470 209,201
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 3.88s 25.28s
Response Time (max) 37.50s 480.96s
Response Time (total) 85.33s 556.14s
Parameters 550B total (55B active) ~35B total (~3B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#182 Nemotron 3 Ultra

none
Cost
$0.000
Time
149.6s
Tokens
3,405 tok

#189 Qwen3.5-Flash

none
Cost
$0.003
Time
47.4s
Tokens
7,799 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3 Ultra 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.02s 7,623 369 0
Qwen3.5-Flash 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 850ms 7,913 519 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair