Navigate
Advertise here

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (low) vs Laguna S 2.1 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 4.6 vs 4.6. Laguna S 2.1 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.108 vs $0.175. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (low) is faster at 83.19s vs 88.24s, with pass rates of 40.6% vs 23.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-19

Compared models

Rank
#378
Total Output Tokens
647,336
Response Time (avg)
83.19s
Total Cost
$0.175
Rank
#377
Total Output Tokens
437,706
Response Time (avg)
88.24s
Total Cost
$0.108
Recommended model Laguna S 2.1 (low)

It has the best score here (4.6), while costing about 1.6x less than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Nemotron 3.5 Lightning Nemotron 3.5 Lightning low Release: 2026-08-11 Free Available Laguna S 2.1 Laguna S 2.1 low Release: 2026-07-21 Free Available
Score 4.6 4.6
Rank #378 #377
Reliability 9.5 10.0
Consistency 6.8 7.8
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.6% 23.2%
Flaky tests 9 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 3.627
Total Cost $0.175 $0.108
Input Price $0.060 / 1M $0.090 / 1M
Output Price $0.160 / 1M $0.180 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.030 / 1M $0.009 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 207,883 232,641
Output Tokens 144,718 69,335
Reasoning Tokens 525,897 426,182
Response Time (avg) 83.19s 88.24s
Response Time (max) 597.61s 814.73s
Response Time (total) 1913.41s 2029.57s
Parameters 30B total (3B active) 118B total (8B active)
Availability Weights available Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#378 Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

low
Cost
$0.000
Time
32.2s
Tokens
6,089 tok

#377 Laguna S 2.1

low
Cost
$0.001
Time
6.6s
Tokens
1,314 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 224.42s 7,522 72,614 262,558
Laguna S 2.1 3.8 7.1 22.2% 1 167.51s 7,917 58,111 119,138

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-5.4 NanononevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableDeepSeek V3.2nonevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailablevsGPT-5.4 NanononeDeepSeek V3.2nonevsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableLing 2.6 FlashdefaultvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumLing 2.6 FlashdefaultvsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailablevsQwen3 Coder NextmediumGranite 4.2 8BhighvsLaguna S 2.1lowFree AvailableRing 2.6 1tdefaultvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BhighvsNemotron 3.5 LightninglowFree AvailableNorth Mini CodedefaultFree AvailablevsLaguna S 2.1lowFree Available