Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Summary

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.6 Flash benchmark comparison: Qwen3.6 Flash leads on average score with 6.0 vs 5.5. Qwen3.6 Flash has the lower benchmark cost at $0.015 vs $0.027. Qwen3.6 Flash is faster at 1.60s vs 13.18s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 33.3%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.6 Flash - It has the best score here (6.0), while costing about 1.9x less than Kimi K2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-09

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 none Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 5.5 6.0
Rank #135 #118
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.9 10.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 33.3%
Flaky tests 3 0
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 0.442 0.266
Total Cost $0.027 $0.015
Input Price $0.375 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Output Price $2.025 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 36,034 50,810
Output Tokens 6,657 4,164
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 13.18s 1.60s
Response Time (max) 42.13s 4.60s
Response Time (total) 184.47s 33.59s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#135 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

none
Cost
$0.015
Time
89.1s
Tokens
5,421 tok

#118 Qwen3.6 Flash

none
Cost
$0.005
Time
20.1s
Tokens
4,211 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.6 8.4 8.3% 1 6.24s 652 373 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 3.1 10.0 0.0% 0 1.63s 696 1,554 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 24.56s 7,311 4,708 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.4 10.0 33.3% 0 1.79s 6,488 889 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 2.8 2.1 33.3% 1 19.16s 12,264 748 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.22s 24,675 315 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 42.13s 7,180 187 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.13s 7,794 243 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 4.38s 753 29 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 1.11s 789 15 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.00s 483 76 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 947ms 522 132 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.5 10.0 50.0% 0 2.67s 677 60 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 6.3 10.0 50.0% 0 1.10s 711 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.04s 667 236 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 3.5 10.0 0.0% 0 1.21s 714 669 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 13.99s 5,835 220 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 2.49s 8,211 272 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.90s 212 20 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 649ms 210 9 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair