Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

AI BENCHY Compare

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

Summary

Kimi K2.5 vs GLM 5.2 benchmark comparison: Kimi K2.5 leads on average score with 7.5 vs 7.1. GLM 5.2 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.051 vs $0.348. GLM 5.2 is faster at 6.34s vs 98.43s, with pass rates of 68.3% vs 60.3%.

Recommended model: GLM 5.2 - Its score stays close to the best score here (7.1 vs 7.5), while costing about 6.9x less than Kimi K2.5.

Last updated at: 2026-07-02

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 none Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.5 7.1
Rank #45 #63
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 6.9 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.3% 60.3%
Flaky tests 8 1
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.704 0.628
Total Cost $0.348 $0.051
Input Price $0.375 / 1M $0.930 / 1M
Output Price $2.025 / 1M $3.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,312 38,671
Output Tokens 48,379 4,817
Reasoning Tokens 157,747 0
Response Time (avg) 98.43s 6.34s
Response Time (max) 281.00s 20.69s
Response Time (total) 1378.03s 133.19s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#45 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

#63 GLM 5.2

none
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.033
Time
87.7s
Tokens
7,455 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 7.3 5.8 83.3% 2 51.38s 634 2,789 8,880
GLM 5.2 8.3 10.0 75.0% 0 3.70s 567 313 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693
GLM 5.2 3.7 9.5 0.0% 0 7.55s 7,263 1,958 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 71.37s 11,280 703 3,713
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 20.69s 14,296 1,489 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 49.78s 7,020 563 7,940
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 7.17s 7,113 204 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.5 4.4 33.3% 2 137.29s 485 20,753 30,564
GLM 5.2 5.3 10.0 33.3% 0 6.50s 696 27 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.5 3.4 66.7% 1 69.73s 480 3,815 4,262
GLM 5.2 6.1 3.1 66.7% 1 4.42s 480 82 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 92.47s 675 5,371 6,547
GLM 5.2 9.8 10.0 100.0% 0 3.84s 642 66 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 5.3 7.3 44.4% 1 43.23s 659 8,426 12,692
GLM 5.2 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.31s 618 265 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 31.74s 5,933 242 812
GLM 5.2 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.76s 6,807 400 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 83.95s 211 12 7,644
GLM 5.2 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 3.41s 189 13 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair