Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 27B

Summary

Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B benchmark comparison: Kimi K2.5 leads on average score with 6.8 vs 5.6. Qwen3.6 27B has the lower benchmark cost at $0.025 vs $0.328. Qwen3.6 27B is faster at 3.72s vs 98.43s, with pass rates of 68.3% vs 47.6%.

Recommended model: Qwen3.6 27B - It offers the best overall trade-off: a competitive score (5.6), lower cost than Kimi K2.5, and balanced response time.

Last updated at: 2026-06-10

Metric Kimi K2.5 Kimi K2.5 medium Release: 2026-01-27 Qwen3.6 27B Qwen3.6 27B none Release: 2026-04-20
Score 6.8 5.6
Rank #77 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 6.9 7.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.3% 47.6%
Flaky tests 8 6
Total Runs 63 63
Cost per result 3.704 0.467
Total Cost $0.328 $0.025
Input Price $0.400 / 1M $0.290 / 1M
Output Price $1.900 / 1M $2.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 34,312 52,721
Output Tokens 48,379 3,812
Reasoning Tokens 157,747 0
Response Time (avg) 98.43s 3.72s
Response Time (max) 281.00s 11.82s
Response Time (total) 1378.03s 78.08s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#77 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5

medium
Cost
$0.030
Time
58.6s
Tokens
8,683 tok

#119 Qwen3.6 27B

none
Cost
$0.009
Time
83.0s
Tokens
4,549 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Anti-AI Tricks Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 7.3 5.8 83.3% 2 51.38s 634 2,789 8,880
Qwen3.6 27B 3.8 3.7 41.7% 3 2.83s 696 490 0
Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.1 4.6 66.7% 2 217.49s 6,935 5,705 74,693
Qwen3.6 27B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 4.16s 7,913 539 0
Combined Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 71.37s 11,280 703 3,713
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 9.95s 22,497 1,401 0
Data parsing and extraction Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 49.78s 7,020 563 7,940
Qwen3.6 27B 7.3 5.8 83.3% 1 2.06s 7,788 248 0
Domain specific Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.5 4.4 33.3% 2 137.29s 485 20,753 30,564
Qwen3.6 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 3.03s 789 24 0
General Intelligence Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 6.5 3.4 66.7% 1 69.73s 480 3,815 4,262
Qwen3.6 27B 5.2 9.9 0.0% 0 1.07s 522 72 0
Instructions following Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 92.47s 675 5,371 6,547
Qwen3.6 27B 6.2 5.8 66.7% 1 1.92s 711 49 0
Puzzle Solving Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 5.3 7.3 44.4% 1 43.23s 659 8,426 12,692
Qwen3.6 27B 5.3 7.2 44.4% 1 5.15s 714 639 0
Tool Calling Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 31.74s 5,933 242 812
Qwen3.6 27B 9.5 10.0 100.0% 0 6.74s 10,881 339 0
Trivia Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Kimi K2.5 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 83.95s 211 12 7,644
Qwen3.6 27B 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 4.03s 210 11 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair