Navigate
Advertise here

Muse Wonder (low) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (medium)

Muse Wonder (low) leads on average score with 9.1 vs 9.0. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.096 vs $2.637. Muse Wonder (low) is faster at 16.00s vs 30.42s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 84.1%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-13

Compared models

Rank
#38
Total Output Tokens
82,847
Response Time (avg)
16.00s
Total Cost
$2.637
Rank
#43
Total Output Tokens
92,998
Response Time (avg)
30.42s
Total Cost
$1.096
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (9.0 vs 9.1), while costing about 2.4x less than Muse Wonder (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Wonder Muse Wonder low Release: 2026-10-13 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) medium Release: 2026-09-07
Score 9.1 9.0
Rank #38 #43
Reliability 9.7 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.3
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 84.1%
Flaky tests 1 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 15.512 6.084
Total Cost $2.637 $1.096
Input Price $4.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $20.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.200 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 244,997 268,540
Output Tokens 11,148 7,499
Reasoning Tokens 71,699 85,499
Response Time (avg) 16.00s 30.42s
Response Time (max) 83.98s 168.09s
Response Time (total) 367.91s 699.68s
Parameters ~1T total (~50B active) 2.4T total (~100B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#38 Muse Wonder

low
Cost
$0.080
Time
28.1s
Tokens
4,067 tok

#43 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

medium
Cost
$0.036
Time
108.3s
Tokens
5,980 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Wonder 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.81s 7,401 1,050 15,813
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 45.74s 7,893 551 20,628

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Muse WonderlowvsParetodefaultSeed 2.1 TurbohighvsMuse WonderlowGemini 3.5 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsMuse WonderlowMuse WonderlowvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumMuse WonderlowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highGemini 3.5 Flash LitehighvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumClaude Opus 5lowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumGemini 3.6 FlashlowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumQwen3.8 Max (0902)mediumvsGLM 5.3 FlashmaxMuse WonderlowvsQwen3.8 MAXmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsMuse Wonderlow