Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh) vs GPT-5.2 Chat

Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh) leads on average score with 8.2 vs 8.0. GPT-5.2 Chat has the lower benchmark cost at $0.604 vs $0.632. GPT-5.2 Chat is faster at 7.65s vs 94.47s, with pass rates of 75.8% vs 74.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-11

Rank
#39
Total Output Tokens
455,790
Response Time (avg)
94.47s
Total Cost
$0.632
Rank
#45
Total Output Tokens
30,424
Response Time (avg)
7.65s
Total Cost
$0.604
Recommended model GPT-5.2 Chat

Its score stays close to the best score here (8.0 vs 8.2), while responding about 12.3x faster than Muse Glimmer 30B (xhigh).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh Release: 2026-08-11 GPT-5.2 Chat GPT-5.2 Chat none Release: 2025-12-11
Score 8.2 8.0
Rank #39 #45
Reliability 9.8 10.0
Consistency 8.3 8.6
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 75.8% 74.2%
Flaky tests 5 4
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.509 4.308
Total Cost $0.632 $0.604
Input Price $0.350 / 1M $1.750 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $14.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 110,918 101,248
Output Tokens 126,922 30,424
Reasoning Tokens 328,868 0
Response Time (avg) 94.47s 7.65s
Response Time (max) 576.79s 38.52s
Response Time (total) 2078.31s 168.39s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#39 Muse Glimmer 30B

xhigh
Cost
$0.007
Time
94.6s
Tokens
4,318 tok

#45 GPT-5.2 Chat

none
Cost
$0.010
Time
15.3s
Tokens
797 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 105.91s 7,428 18,697 63,334
GPT-5.2 Chat 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 9.82s 7,305 6,731 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair