Navigate
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (high) vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium)

Muse Glimmer 30B (high) leads on average score with 7.7 vs 7.6. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.047 vs $0.625. Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium) is faster at 24.79s vs 69.87s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 75.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#115
Total Output Tokens
388,743
Response Time (avg)
69.87s
Total Cost
$0.625
Rank
#119
Total Output Tokens
143,965
Response Time (avg)
24.79s
Total Cost
~$0.047
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next (medium)

Its score stays close to the best score here (7.6 vs 7.7), while costing about 13.3x less than Muse Glimmer 30B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B high Release: 2026-08-11 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next medium Release: 2026-10-04
Score 7.7 7.6
Rank #115 #119
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 7.3 7.9
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 75.4%
Flaky tests 8 6
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 5.675 ~0.314
Total Cost $0.625 ~$0.047
Input Price $0.350 / 1M N/A
Output Price $1.500 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.040 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 281,859 278,792
Output Tokens 102,526 1,695
Reasoning Tokens 286,217 142,270
Response Time (avg) 69.87s 24.79s
Response Time (max) 451.90s 159.62s
Response Time (total) 1607.12s 570.26s
Parameters 30B 180B total (6B active)
Availability Open source Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#115 Muse Glimmer 30B

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
61.7s
Tokens
3,097 tok

#119 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

medium
Cost
~$0.002
Time
40.7s
Tokens
4,059 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 95.97s 7,419 16,128 55,433
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 45.53s 7,893 346 37,643

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair