Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Muse Glimmer 30B (high) vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max leads on average score with 7.4 vs 7.3. Qwen3.7 Max has the lower benchmark cost at $0.197 vs $0.529. Qwen3.7 Max is faster at 4.52s vs 65.50s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 68.2%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-11

Rank
#84
Total Output Tokens
372,149
Response Time (avg)
65.50s
Total Cost
$0.529
Rank
#79
Total Output Tokens
12,446
Response Time (avg)
4.52s
Total Cost
$0.197
Recommended model Qwen3.7 Max

It has the best score here (7.4), while costing about 2.7x less than Muse Glimmer 30B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Glimmer 30B Muse Glimmer 30B high Release: 2026-08-11 Qwen3.7 Max Qwen3.7 Max none Release: 2026-05-22
Score 7.3 7.4
Rank #84 #79
Reliability 10.0 9.9
Consistency 7.6 10.0
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 68.2%
Flaky tests 7 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 4.805 1.582
Total Cost $0.529 $0.197
Input Price $0.350 / 1M $1.475 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $4.425 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 103,482 95,983
Output Tokens 105,680 12,446
Reasoning Tokens 266,469 0
Response Time (avg) 65.50s 4.52s
Response Time (max) 451.90s 72.30s
Response Time (total) 1440.91s 99.52s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#84 Muse Glimmer 30B

high
Cost
$0.005
Time
61.7s
Tokens
3,097 tok

#79 Qwen3.7 Max

none
Cost
$0.046
Time
195.0s
Tokens
12,171 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Glimmer 30B 8.8 7.8 88.9% 1 95.97s 7,419 16,128 55,433
Qwen3.7 Max 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.35s 7,911 582 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair