Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Muse Ember (xhigh) vs Qwen3.8 27B (high)

Muse Ember (xhigh) leads on average score with 8.8 vs 8.7. Muse Ember (xhigh) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.232 vs ~$0.298. Muse Ember (xhigh) is faster at 13.90s vs 166.34s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 78.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-10

Compared models

Rank
#73
Total Output Tokens
409,112
Response Time (avg)
13.90s
Total Cost
$0.232
Rank
#81
Total Output Tokens
677,080
Response Time (avg)
166.34s
Total Cost
~$0.298
Recommended model Muse Ember (xhigh)

It has the best score here (8.8), while responding about 12.0x faster than Qwen3.8 27B (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Ember Muse Ember xhigh Release: 2026-11-09 Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B high Release: 2026-08-14 Free Available
Score 8.8 8.7
Rank #73 #81
Reliability 10.0 9.7
Consistency 8.9 9.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 78.3%
Flaky tests 3 2
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 1.450 ~1.751
Total Cost $0.232 ~$0.298
Input Price $0.100 / 1M N/A
Output Price $0.500 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.004 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price $0.125 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 274,208 348,967
Output Tokens 11,740 1,005
Reasoning Tokens 397,372 676,075
Response Time (avg) 13.90s 166.34s
Response Time (max) 79.38s 640.85s
Response Time (total) 319.61s 3825.81s
Parameters ~150B total (~10B active) 27.3B
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#73 Muse Ember

xhigh
Cost
$0.008
Time
24.3s
Tokens
14,705 tok

#81 Qwen3.8 27B

high
Cost
~$0.008
Time
270.1s
Tokens
18,963 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Ember 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 10.41s 7,410 1,225 40,702
Qwen3.8 27B 8.1 7.0 88.9% 1 248.62s 8,235 346 143,335

Switch Comparison Pair

DeepSeek V4.1 FlashhighvsMuse EmberxhighGPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailablevsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmediumvsMuse EmberxhighSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableGPT-6 SollowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse EmberxhighvsKimi K3.1 PromaxParticle-1xhighvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse EmberlowvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse EmbermaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree AvailableMuse EmberxhighvsGPT-5.4mediumDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsQwen3.8 27BhighFree Available